A. K. Minz v. Chhattisgarh State Co Operative Tribunal

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCC No. 94 of 2017 • A. K. Minz S/o Late Shri S.Minz, Aged About 59 Years The Then Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh, At Present Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Society District Ambikapur, R/o Raja Talab Near Noorani Chowk, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Applicant

Versus

1. Chhattisgarh State Co Operative Tribunal Through Its Chairman, Near Mungeli Naka Chowk, Infront Of Luthra Hospital, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

2. Dilip Patel S/o Ram Dhan Patel, Superseded President, Gramin Seva Sahkari Samiti Maryadit- Bhukel Registration No. 1347, Tehsil Basna, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh

3. Trilochan Bhoi, Superseded Vice President, Gramin Seva Sahkari Samiti Maryadit- Bhukel Registration No. 1347 ((Appellant No.2)

4. Divya Kishore S/o Abhimanyu, (Appellant No.3)

5. Haradhan Sonof Keshbo, (Appellant No.4)

6. Smt. Laxmi Bai W/o Dharni, (Appellant No.5)

7. Smt. Jalkunwar D/o Baheliya, (Appellant No.6) Respondent No.2 to 7 Supersided Directors Of Gramin Seva Sahkari Samiti Marayadit, Bhukel, Registration No. 1347, Tehsil Basna, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh)

8. Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh (Respondent No.1)

9. Gramin Seva Sahkari Samiti Maryadit- Bhukel Registration No. 1347, Tehsil Basna, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh, Through Its Officiating Officer (Respondent No.2) 10.Chhattisgarh Government, Through- Collector, Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh (Respondent No.3) ---- Respondents For Applicant :

Shri RS Baghel, Advocate For Respondents-State :

Shri UNS Deo, GA for the State

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 01/02/2017 I.A. No.1 This is an application for condonation of delay in filing the restoration application.

In view of the order passed by this Court in Smt. Jyoti Vs. General Manager, Canara Bank {MCC 591/2016} holding that the provisions of limitation act do not apply in the writ proceedings or in proceedings arising therefrom, there is no requirement of filing of application for condonation of delay. M.C.C. No.94 of 2017 This is an application for restoration of WPC No.2137/2016 which was dismissed for non-compliance of Court order dated 24.08.2016. On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the restoration application, it is allowed and WPC No.2137/2016 is directed to be restored to its original number.

Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra Ashu