Harishchandra Deewan v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCC No. 96 of 2017 • Harishchandra Deewan S/o Awadhram Deewan, Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Kudel, Post Tarrighat, Police Station And Tahsil Rajim, Civil And Revenue District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, At Present R/o Lakshmi Nagar, Raipur, Police Station And Post Civil Lines, Raipur, Civil And Revenue District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary, Revenue Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Commissioner, Raipur Division, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Collector, Gariyaband, District- Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh

4. Tahsildar, Chhura, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Vikram Dixti, Advocate For Respondents-State :

Shri UNS Deo, GA for the State Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board By 01/02/2017 I.A. No.1 This is an application for condonation of delay in filing the restoration application.

In view of the order passed by this Court in Smt. Jyoti Vs. General Manager, Canara Bank {MCC 591/2016} holding that the provisions of limitation act do not apply in the writ proceedings or in proceedings arising therefrom, there is no requirement of filing of application for condonation of delay.

M.C.C. No.

This is an application for restoration of WPC No.2580/2016 which was dismissed for non-compliance of Court order dated 20.10.2016. On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the restoration application, it is allowed and WPC No.2580/2016 is directed to be restored to its original number, subject , however, on payment of cost of Rs.1000/- to HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH MIDDLE INCOME GROUP LEGAL AID SOCIETY within a period of one week.

It is made clear, if the cost is not paid within a period of one week from today, this order shall lose its efficacy.

Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra Ashu