← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMAC/1809/2019withdrawn

Om Prakash Swarnakar v. Hareram Prasad

2021-01-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MAC No. 1809 of 2019

1. Om Prakash Swarnakar S/o Late Shri Mohan Lal Aged About 47 Years R/o Jain Mandir Road, Bazar Chowk Bhilai - 3, Police Station Purani Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh

2. Harsh Swarnakar S/o Shri Om Prakash Swarnakar Aged About 12 Years Minor Through Legal Guardian Father Om Prakash Swarnakar Son Of Late Mohan Lal, R/o Jain Mandir Road, Bazar Chowk Bhilai - 3, Police Station Purani Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh

3. Tushar Swarnakar S/o Shri Om Prakash Swarnakar Aged About 10 Years Minor Through Legal Guardian Father Om Prakash Swarnakar Son Of Late Mohan Lal, R/o Jain Mandir Road, Bazar Chowk Bhilai - 3, Police Station Purani Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh. (Claimants), District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Appellants

Versus

1. Hareram Prasad S/o Late Ramsakal Prasad Aged About 54 Years R/o Ward No. 14, A.C.C. Main Gate, Rajeev Nagar, Jamul, Bhilai, Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh. (Driver Of Offending 1109 Truck No. Cg-07, Ca-0687),, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh

2. Nitesh Kumar Shrivastava S/o R.P. Shrivastava Aged About 38 Years R/o Ward No. 8, A.C.C., Jamul, Behind Ram Mandir, Jamul, Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh. (Owner Of Offending 1109 Truck No. Cg -07, Ca-0687)., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh

3. Shriram General Insurance Company Limited Head Office, E-8, E.P.I.P, Rico Industrial Area, Sitapura, Jaipur - 302022, Rajasthan, Branch Manager, Branch Office, Fourth Floor, Maruti Heights, G.E. Road Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh (Insurer Of Offending 1109 Truck No. Cg-07, Ca-0687)., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Appellants :

Shri Praveen Dhurandhar, Adv.

For Respondent No. 2 :

Shri Rajkumar Sahu, Adv.

For Respondents No. 1 and 3: None though notice served.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order on Board 11.01.2021 1.

Heard on I.A. No. 2/2020, application for withdrawal of appeal.

2.

This is not the appellants' case that appeal may fail due to formal defects or there are sufficient grounds for allowing the appellants to institute a fresh appeal for the subject matter of the instant appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn by the appellants.

3.

I.A. No. 2 disposed off accordingly.

Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) JUDGE kishore