Girjashankar Johar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Appeal No. 746 of 2018 • Girjashankar Johar S/o Late Shri Basani Ram Johar Aged About 46 Years Inspector, R/o Geetanjali City, Phase - 2, House No. 34, Bahtarai, Road, Sarkanda, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ---- Appellant

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Home Mahanadi Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Director General Of Police Police Head Quarters, Chhattisgarh, Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Deputy Inspector General Of Police (Admn.) Police Head Quarters, Chhattisgarh, Raipur Chhattisgarh.

4. Inspector General Of Police Bilaspur Range, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

5. Superintendent of Police Raigarh Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents __________________________________________________________________ For Appellant :

Shri Kishore Bhaduri and Shri Vivek Shrivastava Advocates For Respondents/State :

Shri A.S. Kachhawaha, Additional Advocate General Hon'ble Shri Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Judgment on Board Per, Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice 24.10.2018 1.

The appeal is disposed off in terms of the observation given by the learned Single Judge in paragraph 20 of the impugned order, which reads as under :- "20. In the given facts, this Court is of the opinion that, the entire matter itself can be resolved if the petitioner is directed to complete the requisite formalities required by moving an appropriate application for adjustment of leave that he has in his credit for the intervening period and also for reporting for duty at transferred place at Sukma i.e. for completion of the requisite formalities of settling of his post retiral benefits, thereafter the respondent No.2 would take a decision within a fortnight from the date the petitioner completes the formalities. 2.

Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that he is willing to also now give fresh notice for VRS by paying three months salary in lieu of period of notice and the State should decide the matter by 26.10.2018.

3.

The Court expects that the Respondent State authorities would be prompt in a early decision.

Sd/- Sd/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi) (Parth Prateem Sahu) Chief Justice Judge Chandra