Shaily Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 8171 of 2019 • Shaily Yadav D/o Ramashankar Yadav Aged About 39 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.), Government High Sec. School Semartal, Block Bilha, DistrictBilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department of Panchayat And Rural Development Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Commissioner-Cum-Director Directorate Of Panchayat, Naya Raipur, DistrictRaipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Executive Officer Jila Panchayat Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Vikas Pandey, Advocate For Respondents/State :

Shri Kunal Das, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 14/10/2019

1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the respondents, whereby the increment granted to the petitioner is being withdrawn on the ground that she has not passed B.Ed/D.Ed examination.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue with regard to withdrawal/non-grant of increment on the ground of having not passed B.Ed/D.Ed examination was examined by this Court in the case of Jayant Kumar Patle v. State of Chhattisgarh (WPS No.4271 of 2017 and batch of petitions, vide order dated 03.11.2017) and various directions have been issued for affording proper opportunity of hearing and then decide the matter.

3. Learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioner's claim would be examined after affording opportunity of hearing in terms of order dated 03.11.2017 passed in the case of Jayant Kumar Patle (supra).

4. Considering the aforesaid submission, this petition is finally disposed of, with a direction to the respondents for examination of petitioner's claim in terms of order passed by this Court in the case of Jayant Kumar Patle (supra) and take appropriate decision thereon.

5. The writ petition stands accordingly disposed off. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Ashu