High Court Of ChhattisgarhCONT/328/2017disposed off

Tikaram Lahre v. Fareeha Alam Siddiqui

2017-07-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Contempt Case (Civil) No.328 of 2017

1. Tikaram Lahre S/o Shri Siddharam, Aged About 35 Years Shiksha Karmi Grade- I I I (Librarian) Govt. Higher Secondary School Semartal, Block Bilha, R/o Village & Post Salheghori, Tahsil Lormi, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh

2. Ram Kisun Tiger S/o Shri Amarnath, Aged About 35 Years Shiksha Karmi Grade- I I I (Librarian) Govt. Higher Secondary School Bhadi, Block Bilha, R/o Village Matiyari, Post Janji, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

3. Smt. Neelima Sharma W/o Shri Pramod Sharma, Aged About 36 Years Shiksha Karmi Grade- I I I (Librarian) Govt. Higher Secondary School Earlier Ranigaon, Block Kota, Now Bemanavai, Block Bilha, R/o Behind Jabbal & Sons, Nehru Nagar, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. Fareeha Alam Siddiqui Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, New Composite Building, Collectorate, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

2. C.P.Mishra, Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

----Respondents For Petitioners :

Ms. Naushina Afrin Ali, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 06/07/2017 (1) Heard.

(2) This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioners herein, alleging non-compliance of this Court's order dated 30.11.2016 passed in W.P.(S) No.1984 of 2016.

(3) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that

the petitioners' representations have been decided by the respondent authorities on 25.03.2017, but their representations were not considered in accordance with law.

(4) Since, the petitioners' representations have already been considered and decided finally on merit by the respondent authorities, it would not be expedient to entertain the instant contempt petition. (5) Consequently, the contempt petition is dismissed. However, the petitioners are at liberty to question order dated 30.03.2017 in accordance with law, if so advised.

SD/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-