High Court Of ChhattisgarhCONT/427/2017disposed off

Smt. Budhkunwar v. Shri Subodh Kumar Singh

2017-11-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra5 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CONT No. 422 of 2017 • Tribhuwan Das S/o Late Dayal Das, Aged About 66 Years Retired Chowkidar, Water Resources Department, Pipariya Project Sub Division Chhuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. R/o Village Hatbanja, Chhindari Colony, Rajmahal Chowk, Chhuikhadan, Police Station & Tahsil Chhuikhadan District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh.

Versus

Water Resources, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, District New Raipur Chhattisgarh.

CONT No. 438 Of 2017 • Muni Ram Verma S/o Late Birjhu Verma, Aged About 66 Years Retired Gang Man Public Works Department, Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh R/o Village Nawagaon Kala, Post Deoribhat, Police Station & Tahsil Khairagarh District Rajnandgaron Chhattisgarh. • Shri Subodh Kumar Singh Secretary Public Works Department Mantralay Mahanadi Bhawan, District New Raipur Chhattisgarh.

CONT No. 427 Of 2017

• Smt. Budhkunwar D/o Late Jhadu Ram, Aged About 67 Years Retired Reja/gang Man, Public Works Department, Khairagarh, District- Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh) R/oVillage- Dhanmanura, Post- Khairagarh, P.S. & TahsilKhairagarh, District - Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh) • Shri Subodh Kumar Singh Secretary, Public Works Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, District New Raipur (Chhattisgarh) CONT No. 444 Of 2017 • Bela Bai Mahobiya Wd/o Late Bodhu Ram, Aged About 67 Years Retired Chowkidar, Water Resources Department, Sub Division Chhuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh, R/o Mahobiyapara Ward No. 4 Chhuikhadan, P. S. & Tahsil Chhuikhadan District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh).

Water Resources, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, District New Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

CONT No. 426 Of 2017 • Dhannu Lal Verma S/o Late Pannu Lal Verma, Aged About 67 Years Retired Sthal Sahayak, Water Resources Department, Sutiyapath Project Sub Division No. 3 Sahaspur Lohar, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh R/o Ward No. 3 Rajmahal Chowk Chhuikhadan P. S. & Tahsil Chhuikhadan

District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh Water Resources, Mantrayala, Mahanadi Bhawan, District New Raipur Chhattisgarh.

CONT No. 428 Of 2017 • Smt. Malti Verma Wd/o Late Dashrath Verma, Aged About 60 Years R/o Village & Post Pipariya, Police Station & Tahsil Khairagarh District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. • Shri Subodh Kumar Singh Through- The Secretary Of Public Works Department, Mantrallaya Mahanadi Bhawan District Raipur, Chhattisgahr.

CONT No. 425 Of 2017 • Manbodh Verma S/o Late Deep Singh, Aged About 67 Years Retired Gang Man Public Works Department, Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh R/o Village Dumardih, Post Etar, P. S. Gatapar, Tahsil Khairagarh District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh), (Wrongly Mentioned As Manbodh Verma D/o Late Deep Singh) • Shri Subodh Kumar Singh Secretary, Public Works Department Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, District New Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

CONT No. 429 Of 2017 • Kunwar Lal S/o Late Shobit Ram, Aged About 65 Years Retired Carpenter, Public Works Department, Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh, R/o Ward No.17, Shiv Mandir Road, New Bus Stand, P.S. & Tahsil Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh • Shri Subodh Kumar Singh Secretary Public Works Department, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, District New Raipur, Chhattisgarh CONT No. 424 Of 2017 • Devi Lal Deshmukh S/o Late Hanuman Deshmukh, Aged About 69 Years Retired Isthal Sahayak, Water Resources Department, Sub Division Chhuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. R/o Village Laxmanpur, Police Station & Tahsil Chhuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.

Water Resources, Mantralay Mahanadi Bhawan, District New Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

For Petitioners Shri F.S. Khare, Advocate For respective Shri B. Gopa Kumar, Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Shri Respondents Shashank Thakur, Shri Gary Mukhopadhyay & Shri Dhiraj Whankhade, Advocates

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 10/11/2017

1. At the very outset, it is stated by the learned counsel appearing for the respective contemnors that the order passed by this Court has either been complied with or is in the process of compliance.

2. In view of the above, all the contempt petitions are disposed of with an observation that if the respondents have not yet purged the contempt, they may issue orders for compliance of the directions issued by this Court within a period of three months from today.

3. It is made clear that if the grievance still subsists, the petitioners would be at liberty to move afresh before this Court.

Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra Gowri