← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCC/836/2017allowed

Smt. Kusum Jain v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-11-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCC No.836 of 2017

1. Smt. Kusum Jain W/o Madan Chand Jain, Aged About 75 Years R/o Plot No. 321, Vidya Sagar, General Sales Azad Market, Risali, Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh.

2. Ashok Kumar Jain, Son Of Madan Chand Jain, R/o Plot No. 321, Vidya Sagar, General Sales Azad Market, Risali, Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh.

---- Applicants

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Durg District Durg Chhattisgarh.

2. Central Bank Of India, Through Managing Director, H. O. Chandramunkhi Nariman Point Mumbai - 400021

3. Central Bank Of India Through Branch Manager, Central Bank Of India, Opposite Government Polytechnic College, G. E. Road, Durg Chhattisgarh.

4. Arvind Sharma, Tahsildar, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh.

5. Mannulal Kosre, Maal Jamadaar, Tahsil Office, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh.

6. Superintendent Of Police, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh.

7. Amit Suhane R/o Near Tapadia Pathaka Shop, Nemichand Gali, Teldhani Naka Ganj Para, Raipur Chhattisgarh. ---- Non-applicants For Applicants :

Mr. Anurag Jha, Advocate For State :

Mr. Shashank Thakur, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 17/11/2017 (1) Learned counsel for the applicants is heard on restoration

application.

(2) The applicants are seeking restoration of WPC No.64/2017 which was dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 05.10.2017.

(3) On due consideration of the submissions of the learned counsel for the applicants and the grounds taken in the restoration application, I am satisfied that the absence of the applicants' counsel on 05.10.2017 when WPC No.64/2017 was taken-up for hearing was based on bonafide grounds.

(4) Accordingly, M.C.C. No.836/2017 is allowed and WPC No.64/2017 is restored to its original number. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-