High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPCR/1036/2019disposed off

Smt. Santoshi Sethiya v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-10-15Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 1036 of 2019 Smt. Santoshi Sethiya, W/o Shri Bhagat, Sethiya, Aged about 38 years, Occupation Teacher, R/o Nakapara, Puspal Road, Tongpal, Police Station Tongpal, Distt. Sukma, Chhattisgarh. ---Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Home Affaris Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Director General of Police, Police Head Quarter, Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Inspector General of Police (I.G.), Bastar Range, Distt. Bastar, Chhattisgarh.

4. Superintendent of Police, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar, Chhattisgarh.

5. Superintendent of Police, Sukma, Distt. Sukma, Chhattisgarh.

6. Station House Officer (S.H.O.), City Kotwali, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar, Chhattisgarh.

7. Station House Officer (S.H.O.), Bastar Chowki, Police Station Tongpal, Distt. Sukma, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Pushpendra Singh Baghel, Advocate For State/Respondents No. 1 to 7 :

Mr. Ravi Bhagat, Deputy Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 15/10/2019

1. Petitioner's husband is an accused in crime No. 455/2019 for offence under Section 20 (b) of the N.D.P.S. Act and he has been put in custody. Petitioner moved an application for providing a copy of the

CCTV footage and mobile CDR location of raiding party which was rejected by learned Special Judge N.D.P.S, Jagdalpur by order dated 03/09/2019 giving liberty to the petitioner to file an application to the Superintendent of Police, Sukma and Bastar. Accordingly, the petitioner herein moved an application before the Superintendent of Police, Sukma and Bastar which is pending consideration since 09/09/2019.

2. Be that as it may, the concerned Superintendent of Police, Sukma and Bastar are directed to consider and decide petitioner's application in accordance with law expeditiously. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.

3. With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition (criminal) stands disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Harneet