High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/8157/2019disposed off

Meena Das v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-10-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8157 of 2019 Meena Das W/o Shri Partha Das Aged About 52 Years Presently Working As A.N.M. (Female) In Government Primary Health Center, Kadar Block Bilha District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Additional Secretary Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Medical And Health Officer District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

4. Block Medical Officer Block - Bilha, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ----Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Satish Gupta, Advocate For State :

Mr. Ayaz Naved, G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 01/10/2019

1. The challenge in the present writ petition is to the order dated 23.08.2019 whereby the services of the petitioner has been transferred from Primary Health Centre, Kadar, District Bilaspur to Sub Health Centre, Sajapani, Block Kartala, District Korba.

2. Referring to Clause-5 of the impugned order, the counsel for the petitioner submits that the seniority and promotion aspect of the petitioner is going to adversely affect as the petitioner is working in a Class-III cadre post and where the seniority is maintained district wise.

3. Given the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner make a representation in this regard to the respondents within a period of 10 day from today

and the respondents, in turn, shall consider and decide the same in accordance with transfer policy at the earliest preferably within a further period of 45 days. Till the representation of the petitioner is decided, the effect and operation of the order impugned shall remain stayed so far as petitioner is concerned.

4. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved