← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhCRR/1162/2018dismissed

Yagyanarayan Tiwari v. Smt. Sarita Tiwari

2018-10-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Criminal Revision No. 1162 of 2018 Yagyanarayan Tiwari, S/o. Shri Laxmi Prasad Tiwari, aged about 53 years, R/o. Village Lakhaali, Tahsil-Champa, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). ----Applicant

Versus

1.

Smt. Sarita Tiwari, aged about 37 years, W/o. Yagyanarayan Tiwari, 2.

Ku. Diksha Tiwari, D/o. Yagyanarayn Tiwari, aged about 14 years, Minorthrough natural guardian Mother Smt. Sarita Tiwari, aged about 37 years Both are R/o Nargoda, Police Station- Seepat, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.).

---- Respondents For Applicant :

Mr. Ram Kumar Tiwari, Advocate For Respondents :

None.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel Order on Board 25/10/2018 1.

Heard on admission.

2.

This revision has been preferred against the order dated 20/09/2018 passed by the Family Court, Bilaspur, whereby the learned Family Court partly allowed the application filed by the respondents under Section 127 of the Cr.P.C and enhanced the monthly maintenance amount in favour of the respondents.

3.

Initially, vide order dated 04/06/2014, the learned Family Court had allowed the application filed under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C and granted monthly maintenance of Rs. 1300/- and Rs. 700/- in favour of respondent Nos. 1 & 2, respectively.

4.

Admittedly, the applicant works as Purohit. He has admitted the fact that apart from the work of Purohit, he is also engaged in the business of

bricks and he has earning from that work also. 5.

Looking to the above facts and circumstances, the Family Court had enhanced the monthly maintenance amount of Rs. 2000/- and Rs. 1500/- in favour of respondent Nos. 1 & 2, respectively, which in my considered view is just and proper.

6.

The revision has no merit. The same deserves to be and is hereby dismissed at the motion stage itself.

Sd/- (Arvind Singh Chandel) Judge Rahul