Pintu @ Pretam Thakur v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR M.Cr.C. No. 8911 of 2018 Pintu @ Pretam Thakur S/o Sankata Thakur, aged about 27 years, R/o Maa Bhawani Chowk, Kumharpara, Jagdalpur, District-Bastar (CG) ---Applicant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, through the Station House Officer, Police Station - Bodhghat, District-Bastar (CG) ---Non-applicant For Applicant :
Mr.Dharmesh Shrivastava, Advocate For-Non-applicant :
Mr.A.N.Bhkata, Dy.A.G.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 09/01/2019 1.
This is the third bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No.360/2014, registered at Police Station-Bodhghat, District-Bastar (CG), for the offence punishable under Sections 467, 468, 471, 472, 419, 420, 409, 119, 182, 211 and 120B read with Section 34 of the IPC. 2.
Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the applicant along with other co-accused by forged documents and bills, withdrawn Rs.1,38,86,538/- and thereby committed the offence. 3.
Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that applicant has not committed any offence and he has falsely been implicated in
crime in question. He would further submit that co-accused Sunit Kasde and Pankaj Kumar Kela have been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide orders dated 9.2.2018 and 19.6.2018 in M.Cr.C.Nos.7356 of 2017 and 3195 of 2018.
4.
On the other hand, Learned State counsel would oppose the prayer for grant of bail.
5.
I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary.
6.
Considering the allegations against the present applicant, material available in the case diary, role played by him and his case being distinguishable from other co-accused who have been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court, I do not find any change in circumstances or new ground to entertain this third bail application. Accordingly, third bail application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. is rejected.
7.
Certified copy as per rules.
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) JUDGE B/-