Parmanand Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 6876 of 2021 Parmanand Yadav S/o Shri Sonau Ram Yadav Aged About 43 Years Assistant Teacher (L. B.) Govt. Primary School Gangajal Block- Block Nawagarh District Janjgir- Champa Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar New Raipur Chhattisgarh.
2. The Secretary Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar New Raipur Chhattisgarh.
3. The Director Panchayat And Rural Development, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar New Raipur Chhattisgarh.
4. The Chief Executive Officer Jila Panchayat Janjgir District Janjgir- Champa Chhattisgarh.
5. The District Education Officer District Janjgir- Champa Chhattisgarh.
6. The Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Nawagarh District Janjgir- Champa Chhattisgarh.
7. The Block Education Officer Block Nawagarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.
-----Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner :
Mr. Ashwani Shukla, Advocate Respondents :
Mr. Ravi Bhagat, Dy. Govt. Advocate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 14.12.2021 1.
Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioner has competed 8 years of service on the post of Assistant
Teacher (LB) and he is entitled for grant of arrears of payment of revised pay scale, which has not been considered and decided by respondent No. 6 till this date.
2.
Be that as it may, the petitioner is at liberty to make representation before respondent No. 6/ Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Nawagarh within two weeks and the same shall be decided by respondent No. 6 within four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order in accordance with law. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merit of the case.
3.
With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition finally stand disposed of.
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Santosh