High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/8335/2019disposed off

Fulgence Toppo v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-10-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 8335 of 2019 Fulgence Toppo S/o Shri Julius Aged About 59 Years Posted as Sub Registrar In the Office of the Sub Registrar Abhanpur Raipur District Raipur, R/o House No. 313., Near Sarshwati Gyan Mandir, Ward No. 16 Tulsipur, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Under Secretary, Commercial Tax (Registration) Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh Pin 492001.

2. Inspector General Registration Raipur Commercial Tax (Registration) Department, Behind Chhattisgarh Nirwachan Bhawan Ghadi Chouk Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh Pin 492001.

3. District Registrar Raipur Office of The District Registrar Raipur, In-Front of Chhattisgarh Nirwachan Bhawan, Near Ghadi Chouk Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. Pin 492001.

4. Sub Registrar Office of the Sub Registrar Abhanpur Raipur, Raipur Tahsil Campus District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

---Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Vijay K Deshmukh, Advocate.

For State :

Shri Jitendra Pali, Dy. Advocate General.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 04.10.2019

1. Challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the order of transfer dated 25.09.2019 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Abhanpur to Pandariya.

2. The challenge is on the ground that the impugned order of transfer has been issued during ban period and that there is no administrative exigency for transferring the petitioner. He further submits that the department itself, when ban was lifted, had issued various transfer orders but the name of the petitioner was not reflected in those orders and after the ban was again imposed by the State Govt., the present impugned order has been passed.

-23. Given the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner make a detailed representation in this regard to the respondents within a period of 10 day from today, who in turn, shall consider and decide the same at the earliest preferably within a further period of 45 days.

4. Till the representation of the petitioner is decided, the effect and operation of the impugned order shall remain stayed so far as petitioner is concerned.

5. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge inder