← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCRC/2139/2017allowed

Jagan Singh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-03-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

Page No.1 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR M.CR.C. No. 2139 of 2017 Jagan Singh, S/o. Ram Chandra Singh, Aged About 24 Years, R/o. 12, Kholi Bilaspur, Police Station: Tarbahar, Tahsil Bilaspur, Civil & Revenue District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. .

---- Applicant

Versus

State Of Chhattisgarh, Through : Station House Officer, Police Station: Chakarbhatha, District: Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent For Applicant :

Mr. Amit Kumar Chaki, Advocate For Respondent :

Mr. Anupam Dubey, Dy. Govt. Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 30/03/2017 1.

This is the second bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No.396/2016, registered at Police Station- Chakarbhatha, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 34 (2) & 59 (A) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act. The first bail application was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to repeat the same after examination of the seizure witnesses vide order dated 21.12.2016.

2.

Case of the prosecution in brief is that on 01.11.2016 on a raid being conducted, from the possession of the applicant 99 bulk liters of liquor was seized. Thereby the offence is committed. 3.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that this is second bail application. The first bail application was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to repeat the same after examination of the seizure witnesses and the seizure witnesses namely Ritesh Kumar and Jitendra Jaiswal

Page No.2 have been examined and they have stated that before them no seizure was made; therefore, the applicant may be released on bail. 4.

Learned State counsel opposes the prayer for grant of bail, however, he do not dispute the fact that seizure witnesses have been examined and they have not supported the case of the prosecution. 5.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and further considering the fact that seizure witnesses have been examined and they have not supported the case of the prosecution, without any further observation on merits, this Court is inclined to release the applicant on bail.

6.

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. is allowed.

7.

It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court, for his appearance as and when directed.

Certified copy as per rules.

Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge Balram