D. Sriniwas Rao v. The Union Of India

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 3121 of 2018 1.

D. Sriniwas Rao S/o D. S. Shastry Aged About 34 Years Unemployed, C/o Arati, Computer Karbala Road, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

The Union Of India Through Chairman Railway Board, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi.

2.

General Manager SECR, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

3.

Principal Chief Engineer SECR, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 4.

Divisional Railway Manager SECR, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5.

Senior Divisional Engineer (Coordinator) SECR, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 6.

Senior Divisional Engineer (Settlement), SECR, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 7.

Senior Divisional Electrical Engineer (General) SECR, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 8.

Divisional Security Commissioner Railway Protection Force, SECR, Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 9.

Commissioner Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 10.

Collector Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, ---- Respondent For Petitioner Shri Uttam Pandey, Advocate For Respondent/Railways Shri Abhishek Sinha, Advocate For Respondent/State Shri Shashank Thakur, Govt. Adv.

Order On Board By Prashant Kumar Mishra, J.

28/11/2018 1.

There being no prevailing scheme under which the Railways can allot shop/plot to the petitioner, no direction can be issued to the respondents for consideration of petitioner's application for such allotment. If the petitioner comes across any such scheme of the Railways, he would be at liberty to move representation on the basis of any such enforceable scheme. 2.

Since no direction can be issued in this writ petition, the same is dismissed.

Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra Gowri