Crest Steel And Power Private Limited v. Union Of India
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 3022 of 2018
1. Crest Steel And Power Private Limited A Company Formed And Constituted Under The Companies Act, 2013 Having Its Registered Office At Joratarai Village, Post Mangatta, District Rajnandgaon- 491441 Chhattisgarh.
2. Mr. Abhay Lodha Working For Gain At Crest Steel And Power Limited And R/o Joratarai Village, Post Mangatta, District Rajnandgaon- 491441, Chhattisgarh.
---- Petitioners
Versus
1. Union Of India Through Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, North Block, Cabinet Secretariat , Raisina Hill, New Delhi- 110011, District : New Delhi.
2. Ministry Of Steel Through- Secretary, Udhyog Bhawan, New Delhi- 110011., District : New Delhi.
3. The Reserve Bank Of India A Body Corporate Formed And Constituted Under The Reserve Bank Of India Act, 1934 Having Its Office At N S Road, Kolkata- 700001, West Bengal.
4. The State Bank Of India A Body Corporate Formed And Constituted Under The State Bank Of India Act, 1955, Having Its Registered Office At State Bank Bhavan, Corporate Centre, Madamecama Road, Mumbai Maharashtra 400021 And Inter Alia, Carrying On Business Through Its Stressed Assets Management Branch, Mumbai Having Its Office At Greater Mumbai, Arcade, 2nd Floor, World Trade Center, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai- 400005, District : Mumbai, Maharashtra.
5. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Principal Secretary, Industries Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondents ________________________________________________________ For the Petitioners :-Shri Ankit Pandey on behalf of Shri Apoorv Mishra, Advocates For Union of India & Respondent No. 2 :-Shri Raj Kumar Gupta, Adv. For Respondent No. 3 :-Shri Saurabh Sharma & Somkant Verma, Advocates For State/Respondent No. 4:- Shri Raghvendra Verma, G.A. _______________________________________________________________
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vimla Singh Kapoor, Order on Board 12.06.2019
1. Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition.
2. Permission is granted.
3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Vimla Singh Kapoor) Vacation Judge Prakash