Shesh Narayan Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 8555 of 2019

1. Shesh Narayan Yadav, S/o. Late Sukhi Ram Yadav, Aged About 46 Years, R/o. Chhattisgarh Nagar Raipur, Police Station-Tikrapara, Tahsil-Raipur, District-Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Papa Rao Kuata, S/o. Shri K. Venkat Rao, Aged About 58 Years, R/o. Sanyasi Para Khamtarai Raipur, Police Station- Khamtarai, TahsilRaipur, District-Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. M.R. Nirapure, S/o. Shri K.Y.G. Mirapure, Aged About 62 Years, Working As Assistant Grade- II In The Officer Of The Chhattisgarh State Election Commission Raipur, Tahsil Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Its Secretary, General Administration Department, Mahanadi Bhavan, Police Station And Post Rakhi, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Secretary Of State Election Commission, Office Of Chhattisgarh State Election Commission, D K S Bhawan, Near Old Mantralaya, Raipur, Police Station Gol Bazar, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Pranay Kumar Verma, Working As Assistant Grade II In The Officer Of The Chhattisgarh State Election Commission Raipur, Tahsil-Raipur, District-Raipur Chhattisgarh

4. U R Sahu, R/o. House No 29/429, Back Side Of Mukesh Tailor, Shanti Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh

5. Gopal Bharti R/o Near Church Of Emmanuel, Mana Camp, Dhamtari Road, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

6. B K Vishwash Working As Sub Divisional Officer In The Officer Of The Chhattisgarh State Election Commission Raipur, Tahsil-Raipur, DistrictRaipur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. A.K.Yadav, Advocate For State :

Mr. Soumya Rai, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board

17.10.2019

1. Grievance of the petitioners is that the petitioners were appointed as Assistant Grade-III in the Revenue Department. Subsequently, in the year 2003, their services were transferred on deputation to the Election Commission. Likewise, the other persons of the other Department were placed on deputation in the year 2006 to the Election Commission who were junior to the petitioners; however, subsequently, the petitioners' seniority were not considered and juniors were given promotion. Consequently, the petitioners have made a representation Annexure P-1 to the Secretary, General Administration. It is contended that at this moment, the limited prayer of the petitioners is that their representation may be decided.

2. Considering the limited prayer of the petitioners, since the earlier representation of the petitioners appears to be of 25.01.2019, it is directed that the petitioners shall be at liberty to make a fresh representation to the respondent No.1 within a period of three weeks and thereafter the respondent No.1 shall decide the same within an outer limit of 90 days.

3. With such observation, the petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge ashok