High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/3010/2018disposed off

Balmukund v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-10-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra3 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 3005 of 2018 • Punit S/o Prem Singh Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Taroud, Tahsil Akaltara, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Collector District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.

3. Sub Divisional OfÏcer (Revenue) Cum- Competent Authority National Highway No. 200 (New No. 49) Champa, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent WPC No. 3010 of 2018 • Balmukund S/o Gajpati Aged About 62 Years R/o Village Taroud, Tahsil Akaltara, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Collector District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

3. Sub Divisional OfÏcer (Revenue) Cum- Competent Authority National Highway No.200 (New No.49) Champa, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent WPC No. 3013 of 2018 • Santoshi D/o Sonau Yadav, Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Taroud, Tahsil Akaltara, District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, DistrictRaipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Collector District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

3. Sub Divisional OfÏcer (Revenue) Cum-Competent Authority National Highway No. 200 (New No.49) Champa, DistrictJanjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Petitioner Mr. Govind Dewangan, Advocate For Respondent/State Mr. YS Thakur, Additional Advocate General Order On Board By Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra 29/10/2018

1. It appears, compensation has been assessed by the SDO (Revenue), Champa on account of acquisition of land belonging to the petitioners for construction of Bilaspur - Urdawal National Highway and bypass road on NH No.200/49 and the petitioners were informed on 24.08.2016 (Annexure-P-3) to receive the amount of compensation. However, according to the petitioners' counsel, the amount has not yet been paid despite several visits to the OfÏce of the Land Acquisition OfÏcer.

2. Considering the entire facts situation of the case, the writ petitions are disposed of with direction that in the event, the

amount has not yet been disbursed to the petitioners and they are lawfully entitled to receive the said amount of compensation, the SDO (Revenue), Janjgir-Champa shall disburse the amount of compensation to the petitioners within a period of one month from the date of submission of representation along with certified copy of this order. The petitioners' entitlement to interest on the awarded amount is left open to be determined as and when the petitioners make such prayer and prefer fresh writ petition for which liberty is reserved in their favour.

3. The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Judge Shyna