Rohit Sharma v. The State Of Chhattisgarh

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 3693 of 2017 • Rohit Sharma S/o Vishwanath Sharma Aged About 24 Years R/o Ward No. 12, Nehru Nagar, Bhilai, Tahsil & District Durg, Chhattisgarh.

--- Appellant

Versus

• The State of Chhattisgarh through the District Magistrate, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent For the applicant :

Mr. Mayank Chandrakar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Suryakant Mishra, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order on Board 23.06.2017

1. This is third bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking grant of regular bail to the applicant in connection with Crime No. 231/2016 registered at P.S. Durg, Distt. Durg (C.G) for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471/34 of IPC and Section 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) of Information Technology Act.

2. The first bail application was dismissed on 19.09.2016 on merits. The 2nd bail application was dismissed on 07.02.2017.

3. As per the prosecution case, one Lokesh Kumar Patil working in RTO made a report that in between 29.02.2016 and 08.03.2016, RTO tax of 50 vehicles was paid by using his computer ID which he could discover on 09.03.2016 and on enquiry it was found that Rajesh Agrawal, RTO agent and Rohit Sharma, Data Entry Operator of Smart Chip Pvt. Ltd., has committed such offence and forged entry was made by using the ID of Lokesh Kumar Patil.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that it is not possible that the offence was committed by the appellant.

5. It is for the trial Court to adjudicate whether the offence was committed by the applicant or not. I do not find any change of circumstances to again reconsider the bail as nothing was pointed out to grant bail. Accordingly, this bail application is also dismissed.

Sd/- GOUTAM BHADURI JUDGE R a o