High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/8439/2019disposed off

Rajeev Kumar Haldar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-10-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 8439 of 2019 Rajeev Kumar Haldar, S/o. Late Shri Vidhan Chandra Haldar, Aged About 40 Years, R/o. Village Tambeshwar Nagar, Post Aragahi, Ramanujganj, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Secretary, School Education Department, State Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Collector, District Balrampur Ramanujganj (Chhattisgarh)

4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Ramchandrapur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh

5. Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Aragahi, New Gram Panchayat Tambeshwar Nagar, Block Ramchandrapur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr. Basant Kaiwartya, Advocate For State :

Mr. Soumya Rai, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 16.10.2019 Heard.

1. The limited grievance which the petitioner has raised in the present writ petition is that he had worked as a Guruji between 01.09.2003 to 30.04.2006 when his services were discontinued.

2. According to the petitioner, some similarly placed persons subsequently had filed a writ petition which stood disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioners therein. According to the petitioner, while deciding the representation of those petitioners, the respondents have granted an order of appointment in their favour which has prompted the present petitioner to approach this Court now.

3. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, since the petitioner has made a representation to the authorities, let the authority concerned take a decision on the representation of the petitioner in accordance with its merit.

4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the entitlement of the petitioner or on the merit of the case. The authorities are expected to pass an order purely in accordance with the rules and regulations governing the field and take a decision on the representation of the petitioner within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

5. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Ashok