Pradeep Yadav v. The State Of Chhattisgarh

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 8331 of 2019 Pradeep Yadav S/o Shri Safedlal Yadav, Aged About 38 Years Currently Working As- Secretary, Gram Panchayat- Piparbhavna, R/o Ramnagar Sarsiwa, Village Sarsiwa, Tehsil Bhilaigarh, District Baloda Bazar (Chhattisgarh).

---- Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat And Social Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Rajdhani, P.S. Rakhi, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. The Collector, Baloda Bazar, P.S. Civil Lines, Tahsil And District Baloda Bazar Chhattisgarh, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

3. The Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat, Baloda Bazar, Tahsil And District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

4. The Deputy Director, Panchayat Avam Samaj Kalyan Vibhag Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Rajdhani, P.S. Rakhi, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

5. Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Piparbhavna, Janpad Panchayat Bhilaigarh, Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

6. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Sub Divisional Officer And Registration Officer (Panchayat), Bhilaigarh, District Baloda Bazaar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh.

7. Tulsi Khatkar, Presently Posted As Secretary, Janpad Panchayat Piparbhavna, R/o Village Sarsiwa, Tehsil Bhilaigarh, District Baloda Bazaar Chhattisgarh, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ---Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Rajat Agrawal, Advocate.

For State :

Shri Jitendra Pali, Dy. Advocate General.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 04.10.2019

1. Challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the order of transfer dated 19.09.2019.

2. Without entering into the merits of the case, the counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to make a detailed representation to the respondents raising all the grievances which has been raised in this petition, and the respondents, in turn, may decide the same as expeditiously as possible.

-23. The said prayer is not opposed.

4. Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner, if so chooses, to prefer a detailed representation to the respondents which considering the fact that it is a case of transfer, the respondents may decide the same as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of representation. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge inder