← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/8441/2019dismissed

Pradeep Kumar Singh v. Registrar General

2020-02-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WP(S) No. 8441 of 2019 Pradeep Kumar Singh, S/o. Shri Shivshankar Singh, Aged About 48 Years, R/o. Near Mamta Tent House, Tikrapara, Bilaspur, Police Station City Kotwali, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Registrar General, Chhattisgarh High Court, Bodri, Bilaspur, Police Station Chakarbhata, Tahsil And Disrict Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

2. Registrar (Judicial), Chhattisgarh High Court, Bodri, Bilaspur, Police Station Chakarbhata, Tahsil And Disrict Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

3. N.K.Kanungo, Additional Registrar, Chhattisgarh High Court, Bodri, Bilaspur, Police Station Chakarbhata, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

4. Livleen Sheikh, Deputy Registrar, Writ Section, Chhattisgarh High Court, Bodri, Bilaspur, Police Station Chakarbhata, Tahsil And Disrict Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Abhishek Pandey, Advocate For Respondents No.1 & 2 :

Smt. Fouzia Mirza, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 11.02.2020 Heard 1.

The petitioner alleged that the petitioner who is working in Writ Section as Assistant Grade-I has been transferred to Civil Section in place of Smt. Vandana Mishra. It is contended that the petitioner infact has raised certain grievance and instead of redressal of the grievance, the petitioner has been transferred to Civil Section.

2.

Though the petitioner claimed that transfer has been made, it is an internal office management, which is under challenge. In order to control, the administrative exigency, which may arise from time to time, one employee can be placed to other section in the High Court irrespective of the fact they were working in that particular section. Working at a particular section does

not confer any right to occupy a particular table or chair of the office, it is the prerogative of the employer and administrative exigency if so required one employee can be placed from one place to another according to the discretion and necessity of the job. Consequently, I do not find any merit in this case to entertain this petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge ashok