Shatruhan Chandraker v. The Commissioner
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5389 of 2021
1. Shatruhan Chandraker S/o Late Shri Jhardiram Chandraker Aged About 62 Years Resident Of Village Kharhatta, Post Office Bodtarakhurd, Tahsil Pandariya, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh
2. Virendra Chandrakar S/o Ramcharan Chandraker Aged About 27 Years Resident Of Village Kharhatta, Post Office Bodtarakhurd, Tahsil Pandariya, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh.
---- Petitioners
Versus
1. The Commissioner Land Records, Durg Chhattisgarh.
2. The Tahsildar , Pandariya District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh.
3. Jhumuk Chandrakar S/o Bishnu Aged About 62 Years Caste Kurmi, Residents Of P.H. No. 33 Village Kharhatta, Tahsil Pandariya, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh.
4. Govardhan Chandraker S/o Jhumuk Aged About 45 Years Caste Kurmi, Residents Of P.H. No. 33 Village Kharhatta, Tahsil Pandariya, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh.
5. Ramswaroop Chandraker S/o Jhumuk Aged About 39 Years Caste Kurmi, Residents Of P.H. No. 33 Village Kharhatta, Tahsil Pandariya, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondents For Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ritesh Verma, Advocate For State :
Mr. Hariom Rai, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 21/12/2021 1.
The limited prayer that petitioner has made in the present writ petition is for appropriate direction to the respondent no.1 & 2 to take appropriate decision in the revenue Revision case no.174/A-68, 175/A-68 & 176/A68 pending before the respondent no.1 & 2 since long be decided at the earliest.
2.
The limited prayer is not opposed by the State counsel except for the ground of locus of the petitioner. The petitioner in the instant case is the
complainant accused in the proceedings that have been initiated and the matter has travelled to the Commissioner.
3. Given the limited relief that petitioner has made the writ petition at this juncture stands disposed of directing the respondent no.1 & 2 to ensure that the proceedings in the revision case no. 174/A-68, 175/A-68 & 176/A-68 pending consideration be finally decided at the earliest preferably within a period of 6 months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
4.
With the above observations/direction, this writ petition stands disposed of.
Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rohit