← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/3097/2018disposed off

Nanhu Ram Agrawal v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-11-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 3097 of 2018 • Nanhu Ram Agrawal S/o Late Mangeram Agrawal Aged About 64 Years R/o AE-5, Kundla Vasundhara City, Kharsiya Road, Ambikapur, District - Surguja, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, New Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Collector District - Surguja, Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh

3. The Sub Divisional Officer (Rev.) Cum Prescribed Authority Land Acquisition, Ambikapur, District - Surguja, Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh

4. The Chief Engineer / Executive Engineer Public Works Department, National Highway Area, Pension Bada, Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

5. The Upper Commissioner Surguja Division, Ambikapur, District - Surguja, Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh

6. Kamla Devi Agrawal D/o Shri Rajesh Agrawal Aged About 42 Years R/o Ae-5, Kundla Vasundhara City, Kharsiya Road, Ambikapur, District - Surguja, Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner Shri P. K. Patel, Advocate For Respondent-State Shri Shashank Thakur, GA Hon'ble Justice Mr. Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 13/11/2018 1.

Despite there being an order passed by the respondent No.5 on 25.10.2017, the amount of compensation has not been paid to

the petitioner.

2.

Petitioner has already moved representation for release of the amount, but no order has yet been passed for releasing the amount in his favour.

3.

Let the concerned Land Acquisition Officer make payment of the amount awarded by the Arbitrator within a period of one month from today. The petitioner's entitlement to interest on the awarded amount is left open to be determined as and when the petitioner makes such prayer and prefers fresh writ petition for which liberty is reserved in his favour.

4.

The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge Nirala