← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/7328/2018disposed off

Miss Tahira Begum v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-11-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P.(S) No. 7328 of 2018 Miss Tahira Begum, D/o. Late Mirza Kalim Baig, Aged About 63 Years, Retired Head Master, Government Primary School Butapara (Bilha), R/o. Khanbadi Gali No. 1, Taiyaba Chowk, Talapara, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 495001 ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department Of Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Block Education Officer, Block Bilha, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Accountant General, O/o. Accountant General, Opposite Vidhan Sabha, Baloda Bazar Road, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner :

Mr. Rakesh Pandey, Advocate For Respondent No.1 & 2 :

Mr. S.P. Kale, Dy. A.G.

For Respondent No.3 :

Mr. Rajkumar Gupta, Advocate --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 02.11.2018 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner worked as Headmaster and retired from service in the year 2017 and his GPF amount was shown as 3,93,119/- as per Annexure P-1 as per the Accountant General, Chhattisgarh, whereas the pass-book would show that after deduction the amount comes to Rs.4,52,995/- as per Annexure P-3. Therefore, under the circumstances, the petitioner is entitled for the said amount. It is contended that in order to overcome such anomaly, the petitioner may be allowed to make a representation to the Respondent No.3 to apprise those facts.

2.

On perusal of the documents, it shows that the pass-book shows an amount of Rs.4,52,995/- whereas Annexure P-1 shows an amount of Rs.3,93,119/-. Therefore, under the circumstances, it is

directed that the petitioner, if files such representation before the Respondent No.3 within a period of 30 days, the same would be decided objectively by evaluating all the facts by the Respondent No.3 within a further period of 45 days and the petitioner if entitled, the same may be granted.

3.

With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge Ashok