Jitendra Kumar Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 8957 of 2019
1. Jitendra Kumar Sahu, S/o Late Mr. Ramdayal Sahu, Aged About 37 Years, Post Lecturer (Local Body), Posted At-Govt. Higher Secondary School, Amoda, Block Narharpur, District Uttar Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh
2. Vijay Kumar Shori, S/o Late Mr. Parsadi Ram Shori, Aged About 36 Years, Post Lecturer (Local Body), Posted At-Govt. Higher Secondary School Amoda, Block Narharpur, District Uttar Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Education Department, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh
2. Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh
3. Commissioner Cum Director Panchayat Sanchanalaya, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh
4. Chief Executive Officer Jila Panchayat, District Uttar Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :
Shri Parag Kotecha, Advocate For Respondents/ State :
Shri Amrito Das, Additional Advocate General Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 05/11/2019
1. Heard.
2. The limited grievance which the petitioner has raised in the present writ petition by virtue of order passed by this Court in the case of Mukesh Kumar Patel Vs. State of Chhattisgarh, WPS No. 2530/2017 decided on 26.11.2017
have been granted benefit of revised pay scale on completion of 8 years of service.
3. The counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance which now remains is that the benefit is being provided to the petitioner prospectively and though the respondents have made a calculation which the petitioner is entitled for from the date of his completion of 8 years of service but no effective orders have been passed nor have department taken any steps for release of the arrears of payment. The petitioner prays for appropriate direction to the respondents for releasing the said amount.
4. Without entering into the merits of the case and taking into consideration the judgment of this Court in the case of Mukesh Patel (Supra) which has also been affirmed by the Division Bench and taking note of the fact that respondents have complied with the order to the extent of granting revised pay scale to the petitioner, let respondents No. 2 & 3 take an appropriate decision at the earliest so far as release of the arrears of payment which the petitioner is entitled for. Expecting a decision from the respondents within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order the present writ petition stands disposed off.
Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Jyoti