High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/8648/2019disposed off

Hajari Lal Sakat v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-11-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 8648 of 2019 • Hajari Lal Sakat S/o Late Shri Shiv Ram Sakat Aged About 49 Years Daily Wager Employee, Sale Depo, Forest Department, Resident Of Pandavpara, Tahsil Kota, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Forest, Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. D.F.O. Bilaspur (Territorial) Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

3. Depo Officer Sale Depo Kota, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Ritesh Verma, Advocate For Respondent/State :

Ms. Richa Shukla, Dy. GA Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 05/11/2019

1. Heard.

2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner was appointed as a daily wager in the year 1989 with the forest department in a sale depo. It is contended that till date though certain policies of the government were framed to regularize the worker and a circular was also issued on 05.03.2008, but the services of the petitioner has not yet been regularized. It is further contended that the petitioner has filed the representation to regularize his service as per the circular dated 05.03.2008, therefore, the petitioner may be regularized

forthwith giving benefit of the circular and the representation of the petitioner may be decided.

3. Considering the grievance of the petitioner that the petitioner contends that he is in the employment since 1989 and has made representation to regularize his service as per the mandate of the circular dated 05.03.2008, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file afresh representation before the respondent No.1 to regularize the services as per the circular dated 05.03.2008 within a period of 30 days from today, the petitioner shall also be at liberty to attach the necessary documents to support his contention. On such representation being filed, the said respondent shall take a decision on the representation within a further period of six months to regularize the services of the petitioner, if he is a beneficiary within the parameters of the circular dated 05.03.2008.

4. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Ashu