← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCRC/6668/2019rejected

Abhineet Yadav v. The State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-12-03Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 6668 of 2019 • Abhineet Yadav S/o Harkesh Bahadur Yadav Aged About 28 Years R/o Faredpur, Thana And Tahsil Kunda, District Pratapgarh Uttar Pradesh.

---- Applicant

Versus

• The State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Jhagrakhand, District Koriya (Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondent For Applicant.

:

Shri Parag Kotecha, Advocate.

For Respondent/State :

Shri Anil Tripathi, P.L.

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey Order on Board 03.12.2019

1. The applicant has filed this application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail in connection with Crime No. 16/2019 registered at Police Station : Jhagrakhand, District Koriya (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 120B read with Section 34 of IPC.

2.

As per the prosecution case, the allegation against the applicant is that the present applicant with other co-accused persons assured the complainant for providing job to the post of Ticket Collector in Railway, for that, they had taken amount of Rs. 10,00,000/- from the complainant but no job was provided to him. Thereafter, offence has been registered

against the applicant and he was arrested.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the crime in question. He further submits that applicant is in jail since 03.07.2019 and he is ready to furnish adequate surety and shall abide by all the conditions and directions, which may be imposed by this Hon'ble Court, therefore, he may be released on bail. 4.

On the other hand, State counsel opposes the bail application.

5.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

6.

Considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, in particular the fact that the amount which was taken from the complainant was very huge, therefore, at this stage, I am not inclined to release him on bail.

7.

Accordingly, his application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is rejected.

Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) Judge Vijay Sahu