Jhumaru Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 8433 of 2018 Jhumaru Yadav S/o Bhagela Yadav, aged about 32 years, R/o near Manas Mandir, Police Station Amanaka, Tahsil and District Raipur (C.G.). --- Applicant

Versus

State of Chhattisgarh, Through Station House Officer Police Station Amanaka, Civil and Revenue District Raipur (C.G.).

---- Respondent For Applicant :

Mr. G.M. Hasan, Advocate For Respondent :

Mr. Vivek Singhal, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel Order on Board 15/11/2018 1.

The applicant has preferred this First bail application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C for grant of regular bail as he is arrested in connection with Crime No. 226/2018 registered at Police Station Amanaka, Civil and Revenue District Raipur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 457, 380, 34 of the IPC. 2.

As per prosecution story, on 31/08/2018 a report was made by Sunil Sai alleging therein that some unknown persons have stolen some machinery articles from his factory. On the basis of said report, offence has been registered against unknown persons. During course of investigation, on the memorandum statement of the applicant, some stolen articles were seized from him. The applicant was arrested on 04/09/2018.

3.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that the

applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated. He further submits that the applicant is in custody since 04/09/2018, charge-sheet has been filed, the applicant has no criminal antecedent and trial will take time, therefore, the applicant may be released on bail. 4.

Per contra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the bail application.

5.

I have heard learned counsel for both the parties. 6.

Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, particularly considering that the applicant is in custody since 04/09/2018, chargesheet has been filed, the applicant has no criminal antecedent and the trial will likely to take some time, without further commenting on merit of the case, I am inclined to release the applicant on bail. 7.

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 8.

It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- with one surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before the said Court, as and when directed.

Sd/- (Arvind Singh Chandel) Judge Rahul