← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPCR/631/2018dismissed

Kunj Ram Chandravanshi v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-03-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

Page No.1 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPCR No. 631 of 2018

1. Kunj Ram Chandravanshi S/o Janak Ram Chandravanshi Aged About 52 Years R/o Village- Kothar, Post- Pipariya, Police Station- Pipariya, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh

2. Toran Ram Sahu S/o Gajanand Sahu Aged About 38 Years R/o Village- Kothar, Post- Pipariya, Police Station- Pipariya, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh --- Petitioners

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Home Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Collector through Kabirdham, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh

3. Suprintendent of Police through Kabirdham, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh

4. Station House Officer through Police Station- Pipariya, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh

5. Ramesh Chandrawanshi S/o Doman Lal Chandrawanshi Aged About 44 Years Proprietor Of Jyoti Rice Mill, Paliguda, Police StationPipariya, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh

6. Dhani Ram Chandrawanshi S/o Ishwari Chandrawanshi Aged About 57 Years R/o Village- Kothar, Post- Pipariya, Police Station- Pipariya, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh

7. Munna Lal Chandrawanshi S/o Juthel Ram Chandrawanshi Aged About 52 Years R/o Village- Kothar, Post Pipariya, Police StationPipariya, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh

8. Anand Chandrawanshi S/o Paras Chandrawanshi Aged About 28 Years Society Manager, R/o Shikshak Colony Kawardha, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh --- Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr. Ramnarayan Sahu Adv.

For State-Respondents :

Mr. Ravi Bhagat, Dy.A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order on Board

Page No.2 13.03.2019 1.

The prayer made in this writ petition is to direct the respondents to take action against respondents 5 to 8 and prosecute them under the Essential Commodities Act. 2.

The petition is as vague as it can be. Neither the petitioner is able to explain what criminal offence has been committed nor is able to explain what law promulgated by the State has been flouted. It is stated that certain enquiry was made and the case has been registered under the Essential Commodities Act bearing No.1/2018 and the paddy of 208 quintals was seized from respondent No.5 Ramesh Chandravanshi, Proprietor of Jyoti Rice Mill, Paliguda and the firm has been black-listed for a period of 3 years for custom milling. In view of such submission, no further order can be passed by this Court. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Sd/- (GOUTAM BHADURI) JUDGE R a o