Vicky Thakur v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 8452 of 2018 Rajkumar @ Mantri S/o Shri Dilip Sidar Aged About 20 Years R/o Sanwarapara, Purani Basti, Kharsia, P. S. Kharsia, Raigarh And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Applicant

Versus

State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer Of The Police Station Kharsia, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent AND MCRC No. 8524 of 2018 Vicky Thakur S/o Shri Mukund Murai Thakur Aged About 21 Years R/o Purani Basti, Kharsia, P. S. And Tahsil Kharsia, And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Applicant

Versus

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Of The Police Station Kharsia, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For the Applicants :

Shri Abhishek Saraf, Advocate For the State :

Shri Vinod Tekam, Panel Lawyer ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board /11/2018

1. As MCRC No. 8452/2018 and MCRC No. 8524/2018 arise out of the same crime number of the same Police Station, they are being disposed of by this common order.

2. The applicants have preferred these first bail application under Section 439 of CrPC and there is no bail applications are pending before any other Court.

3. Perused the case diary provided by the learned counsel for the State in connection with the Crime No.570/2018 registered at Police Station Kharsia, District Raigarh (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 394/34 of IPC.

4. Case of the prosecution, in brief is that on 08/09/2018 at about 19.00 hours at Mangal Bazar, Kharsiya. Applicants and co-accused Ajay beaten him and robbed one moblie Samsung J 7 Sim No. 98261 41722 and one purse containing Rs.5,000/-.

5. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that they have innocent and falsely implicated in the present case, therefore, they shall be released

on bail.

6. On the other hand, counsel for the State opposes the bail application. He further submits that no criminal antecedents against the applicants.

7. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case,looking to the fact that there is no likelihood of the accused to abscond and tamper th evidence, it is directed that if the each applicant furnishes two solvent sureties for a sum of Rs. 25,000/- each along with a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- to the satisfaction of the concerned Court with the condition that they shall appear before the trial Court at 11.00 am as and when directed till trial and they would cooperate during the trial, they shall be released on bail.

8. Certified copy as per rules.

Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge Kamde