Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Ltd. v. Rahul Tripathi

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WA No. 308 of 2017 Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Ltd. Through The General Manager, Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Ltd. Daganiga, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Appellant

Versus

Rahul Tripathi S/o Late Pankaj Kumar Tripathi, R/o Near Primary School, In Front Of Mudapar, S.E.C.L., Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent WA No. 309 of 2017 Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Ltd. Through The General Manager, Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Ltd. Daganiya, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Appellant

Versus

Rahul Thakre S/o Late D.H. Thakre, R/o E W S - 91, Nehru Nagar, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent WA No. 316 of 2017 Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Ltd. Through The General Manager, Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Ltd. Daganiya, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Appellant

Versus

Ajay Kumar Soni S/o Late Bharat Prasad Soni, R/o Ramayan Chowk, Chantidih, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Appellants : Shri Apurv Goyal, Advocate.

For respective Respondents : Dr. N.K. Shukla, Senior Advocate with Shri Ajay Lakra, Shri Ashutosh Shukla and Shri Avinash Singh, Advocates.

Hon'ble Shri Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Judgment on Board 12/03/2019 Per Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice 1.

Heard counsel for the parties.

2.

The writ applications are of the year 2016. The writ applications are still pending for final adjudication. While hearing the matter at the threshold, the learned Single Judge passed an interim order and he refused to vacate it subsequently on 22.06.2017, which led to filing of the present appeals.

3.

It will be in the interest of one and all including justice that on priority, the writ applications are now heard and decided on merit itself. 4.

The writ appeals are disposed off with an expectation that the learned Single Judge on a request being made by the counsel for the Appellants will fix a date, hear the writ applications on merit and pass the necessary order. 5.

In view of the above, the Court is not inclined to interfere with the decision of the learned Single Judge refusing to vacate the interim order. Sd/- Sd/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi) (Parth Prateem Sahu) CHIEF JUSTICE JUDGE Yogesh