High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/1424/2017dismissed

Neeraj Rai v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-08-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 1424 of 2017 Neeraj Rai S/o Markande Rai, Aged About 39 Years Sarpanch Of Gram Panchayat, Mahmand, R/o Village- Mahmand, Main Road, Lalkhadan, Police Station Torwa, Tehsil Bilaspur, Civil And Revenue District- Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Administrative Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Revenue And Civil District- Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Collector, Bilaspur, Revenue And Civil District- Bilaspur Chhttisgarh.

3. Sub- Divisional Officer (Revenue), Bilaspur, Revenue And Civil District- Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

4. Sub- Divisional Officer (Revenue), Bilha, Revenue And Civil District- Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

5. Zila Panchayat, Bilaspur, Through- Chief Executive Officer, Revenue And Civil District- Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

6. Janpad Panchayat, Bilha, Through- Chief Executive Officer, Revenue And Civil District- Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

7. Tehsildar, Bilha, Revenue And Civil District- Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

8. Chandra Prakash Surya, S/o Shadhram Surya, Aged About 36 Years R/o VillageMahmand, Police Station- Torwa, Tehsil- Bilaspur, Civil And Revenue DistrictBilaspur Chhattisgarh.

9. Holy Cross Sister Association/ Holy Cross Institute, Mahmand, ThroughPrincipal, R/o Village- Mahmand, Police Station- Torwa, Tehsil Bilaspur, Revenue And Civil District- Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents Shri Surfaraj Khan, counsel for the petitioner/s. Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer for the State. Shri Mahendra Dubey, Shri B.D.Guru and Shri Sudeep Agrawal, counsel for respective interveners.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 03/08/2017 It is brought to the notice of this Court that in earlier round of litigation, a clear finding was recorded by this Court that the jurisdiction would lie with the Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue), Bilha.

In view of the aforesaid clear finding recorded in the earlier round of litigation vide order dated 08/08/2016 in WPC No.1979/216, this petition does not have any merit. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Deepti