Ramratan Chandra v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 8568 of 2018 Ramratan Chandra S/o Gangaram Chandra, aged about 21 years R/o Village Jogidipa, Police Station Sarsiwa, District Revenue & Civil Balodabazar Bhatapara (C.G.).
--- Applicant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, Through Police Station Sarsiwa, District (Revenue & Civil) Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.).
---- Respondent For Applicant :
Mr. Sumit Jhanwar, Advocate For Respondent :
Mr. R.K. Jaiswal, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel Order on Board 28/11/2018 1.
The Applicant has preferred this First bail application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C for grant of regular bail as he is arrested in connection with Crime No. 131/2018 registered at Police Station Sarsiwa, District (Revenue & Civil) Balodabazar, Bhatapara (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 306 & 376 of the IPC. 2.
In this case, the Deceased was a lady aged about 20 years. As per prosecution story, there was love relation between the Deceased and the Applicant. Both of them had also developed physical relation. It is alleged that the Applicant, after all this, refused to marry with the Deceased and she committed suicide by hanging herself. During course of investigation, two letters allegedly written by the Deceased have been seized. Statement of witnesses have also been recorded and thereafter the Applicant has been arrested.
3.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant submits that the Applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated. There is nothing on record on the basis of which, any offence under Sections 306 & 376 of the IPC is made out against the Applicant. He further submits that the Applicant is in custody since 20/07/2018 and trial will take time, therefore, the Applicant may be released on bail. 4.
Per contra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the bail application.
5.
I have heard learned counsel for both the parties. 6.
Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, particularly considering the evidence collected by the prosecution, without further commenting on merit of the case, I am inclined to release the Applicant on bail.
7.
Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 8.
It is directed that the Applicant shall be released on bail on executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- with one surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before the said Court, as and when directed.
Sd/- (Arvind Singh Chandel) Judge Rahul