← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/8691/2019disposed off

Rameshwar Prasad Rajwade v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-10-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 8691 of 2019 Rameshwar Prasad Rajwade S/o Lt. Shri Budhu Ram Rajwade Aged About 47 Years Working On The Post Of Teacher Panchayat (L.B.) Government Middle School, Mayapur- Ii Block Pratappur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralay, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, P.O. And P.S. Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Under Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralay, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, P.O. And P.S. Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Block Education Officer Pratappur District Surajpur Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri V.K. Pandey, Advocate.

For Respondents/State :

Smt. Richa Shukla, Dy.G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 21/10/2019

1. The challenge in the present writ petition is to the impugned order Annexure P/1 dated 1/10/2019, whereby the services of the petitioner has been transferred from Government Middle School Mayapur-II, Block Pratappur, District Surajpur to Government Middle School, Karra, Block Lundra, District Surguja.

2. The contention of the petitioner is that the petitioner is the Secretary of Chhattisgarh Teachers Association, Block Pratappur, District Surapur and thereby the petitioner falls within the protected category under the transfer

policy of the State Government.

3. Given the said facts, let the petitioner make a detailed representation to the respondents within a period of 15 days from today and the respondents in turn shall decide the representation within a further period of 45 days from the date of receipt of representation. Meanwhile, there shall be a stay of the effect and operation of the impugned order, so far as the petitioner is concerned.

4. The authorities concerned are also directed to verify the fact whether the petitioner does fall under the protected category under the transfer policy of the State Government or not.

5. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge gouri