Virendra Kumar Uikey v. State Of Chhattisgarh

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 7281 of 2018

1. Virendra Kumar Uikey S/o Shri Madan Singh Uikey Aged About 40 Years Working As Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Middle School Dhukupathara, Block Pali, District Korba Chhattisgarh.

2. Nirmal Kumar Rathore S/o Shri Battulal Rathore Aged About 48 Years Working As Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Unant Govt. Middle School Alangidand, Block Pali, District Korba Chhattisgarh.

3. Tulsi Singh Jagat S/o Manharan Singh Jagat Aged About 38 Years Working As Teacher (L.B.), And Posted At Govt. Middle School Saila, Block Pali, District Korba Chhattisgarh.

4. Jaan Singh Paikra S/o Shri Dukalu Singh Paikra Aged About 46 Years Working As Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Middle School Alangidand, Block Pali, District Korba Chhattisgarh.

5. Deepak Kumar Pandey S/o Late Shri Baldau Prasad Pandey Aged About 41 Years Working As Lecturer (Panchayat) And Posted At Govt. High School Devkirari, Block Bilha, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

6. Smt. Sunita Bharti W/o Shri Sanjay Kumar Bharti Aged About 38 Years Working As Lecturer (Panchayat) And Posted At Govt. High School Batra, Block Pali, District Korba Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Panchayat Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh.

3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For petitioners- Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate. For State- Shri S.P. Kale, Dy.A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order 02/11/2018 Heard.

1.

Learned counsel for the parties would submit that the issue raised in this petition is squarely covered by order dated 28.11.2017 passed by this Court in WPS No.2530 of 2017 (Mukesh Kumar Patel and another Vs.

State of Chhattisgarh and another) and batch of petitions wherein the circular dated 23.04.2016 has been quashed, petitions allowed and it has been declared that the petitioners therein shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered by them on a lower post or on the same post. 2.

In view of the aforesaid submission subject to just exception if any and the impugned order and action is based on circular dated 23.04.2016 which has been quashed in the case referred to herein above, the petition also deserves to be allowed with the direction that the petitioners shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered by them on a lower post or on the same post.

3.

No order as to costs.

Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) JUDGE gouri