← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/4023/2019disposed off

Smt. Parwati Dhruw v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-11-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. 4023 of 2019 Smt. Parwati Dhruw W/o Kholu Ram Dhruw, Aged About 56 Years, Sarpanch, Gram Panchyat, Khauli, Tahsil Arang, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat And Gramin Development Department, Mantralaya, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, Police Station Rakhi, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Collector, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. The Additional Collector, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. The Sub Divisional Officer, (Revenue) Arang, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

5. The Gram Panchayat, Khauli, Through Its Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Khauli, Tahsil Arang, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh

6. Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Patel, Advocate For State :

Mr. Ashutosh Mishra, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 13.11.2019

1. The challenge in the present writ petition is to the order Annexure P-1 dated 27.09.2019 passed by the Upper (Additional) Collector, District

Raipur in a proceeding under Section 91 of the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993.

2. Perusal of the record would show that the order under challenge in the present writ petition is a revisable order and the revision lies to the Divisional Commissioner.

3. In view of the fact that there is a statutory alternative remedy available to the petitioner to assail the order passed by the Upper Collector, the present writ petition in its present form stands disposed of reserving the right of the petitioner to approach the concerned authority by way of a revision.

4. Subject to the petitioner filing a revision at the earliest, the Revisional Authority is expected to take a decision on the revision at the earliest preferably within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of the revision.

5. Subject to the petitioner furnishing photocopy of the impugned order, the certified copy shall be returned to her.

Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Khatai