M/S Vijay Shukla v. Devi Dayal Singh

CONT No. 950 of 2019 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CONT No. 950 of 2019 • M/s Vijay Shukla Through - Vijay Shukla ( Proprietor ) , S/o Late Shri Bihari Lal Shukla, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village Makri, Post - Kunda, Tahsil - Pandariya District - Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. ---- Applicant

Versus

1. Devi Dayal Singh Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. D. K. Agrawal Engineer - In - Chief, Public Works Department, Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. T. S. Charavarti Executive Engineer, Office Of Commissioner, Tribal Development Department, Raipur District - Raipur Chhattisgarh.

4. Reena Baba Saheb Kangale Commissioner, Tribal Development Department, Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh.

5. S.R. Tandon Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development Department, Kabirdham District - Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Applicant :- Shri Sunil Tripathi, Advocate For Respondent Nos.1 & 5:- Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent No.3 :- Shri Anup Majumdar, Advocate For Respondent No.4 :- Shri Abhishek Sinha, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board

CONT No. 950 of 2019 24/01/2020

1. The matter is posted today for consideration on I.A. No.1, application for cancellation of arrest warrant issued against respondent No.3.

2. Shri Anup Majumdar, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.3 would submit that on 09.01.2020, respondent No.3 was required to appear before this Court but he was not well, therefore, he could not appear. It is also submitted that respondent No.3 namely; T. S. Charavarti has never appeared in the High Court in any other case, therefore, he was under impression that the matter will be looked by the OIC (Officer-in-charge) appointed by the Government. It is also submitted that the order passed by this Court in WPC No.2787 of 2018 has been fully complied with.

3. Shri Sunil Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for the applicant would certify that the applicant has already received the entire payment.

4. In view of the fact that the contempt has been purged, the warrant of arrest issued against the respondent No.3 is recalled. For the same reason, bailable warrant issued against the respondent No.4 namely; Ms. Reena Baba Saheb Kangale is also recalled.

5. Nothing survives for further proceeding in this Contempt Petition, therefore, the contempt petition stands disposed of. SD/- (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Judge Ayushi