Dr. G.S. Bachchu v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 8813 of 2019 • Dr. G.S. Bachchu, S/o Late Dr. Mangal Singh, Aged About 63 Years, Retired Chief Medical Officer, R/o Awanti Vihar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary Health And Family Welfare Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
2. Director Health Services, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
3. Director Cum Superintendent Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Memorial Hospital, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
4. Accountant General Kosh, Lekha And Pension, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondents For Petitioner :
Ms. M. Asha, Advocate For Respondents/ State :
Shri Kunal Das, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No. 4 :
Shri Rajkumar Gupta, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 24/10/2019
1. Heard.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was retired on 31.12.2017. Subsequent to his retirement he has not been given retiral dues till date. He is getting mere pension of Rs. 14,000/- and there is no valid reason to withhold his retiral dues. Learned counsel further submits that
Coordinate Bench of this Court in WPS No. 5256 of 2016 by judgment dated 17.02.2017 has ordered for constitution of a Committee to look after the problems of retired persons. Pursuant to that a Committee has been constituted and it is stated that this matter may also be referred to the Committee and the Committee may decide the claim of the petitioner.
3. Learned counsel for Respondent No. 4 would submit that the Committee is now working under the State.
4. Learned State counsel also do not dispute the fact.
5. In view of this, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file a detailed representation regarding entire retiral claim before the said Committee within a period of three weeks from today. The petitioner shall also submit two extra set of representation to the Advocate General Office.
6. The detailed representation so filed shall be decided by the said Committee within a further period of 3 months.
7. With the above observation the said petition stands disposed of.
8. Certified copy today.
Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Jyoti