← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCC/1010/2018allowed

Dinesh Kumar Dewangan v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-01-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 1010 of 2018

1. Dinesh Kumar Dewangan S/o Shri Ramnath Dewangan, Aged About 39 Years, Currently Posted As Wdt (Water Shed Development Team) At Iwmp-1 Batch, Sakri Nadi-3 Janpad Panchayat And P.S. Bodla, Civil And Revenue District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh.

2. Sohan Kaiwart S/o Shri Sivlal Kaiwart, Aged About 42 Years, Currently Posted A Wdt (Water Shed Development Team) At Iwmp-4 Batch, Sakri Nadi-3 Janpad Panchayat And P.S. Kawardha, Civil And Revenue District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh.

3. Manoj Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Dinesh Kumar Sahu, Aged About 32 Years, Currently Posted A Wdt (Water Shed Development Team) At Iwmp-3 Batch, Sakri Nadi-2 Janpad Panchayat And P.S. Kawardha, Civil And Revenue District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh.

4. Chatur Ram Chandravanshi S/o Shri Phagu Ram Chandravanshi, Aged About 44 Years, Currently Posted A Wdt (Water Shed Development Team) At Iwmp-4 Batch, Sakri Nadi-3 Janpad Panchayat And P.S. Kawardha, Civil And Revenue District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh. ---Applicants

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Collector, Kawardha Cum President Wcdc, Kawardha, District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh.

3. Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat Kawardha, District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh.

4. C.E.O. State Level Nodel Agency (Slna) Raipur, Vikas Ayabt Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

---Respondents For applicants :

Shri Ajit Singh, Advocate.

For State :

Shri Salim Kazi, Dy.A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board

04/01/2019 1.

The present MCC has been filed seeking restoration of WPS No. 639 of 2014 which got disposed off as having become infructuous on the statement of the petitioner on 02/08/2018.

2.

The counsel for the applicants submits that, the petitioner had inadvertently made a submission as the said instructions was to be made in another Writ Petition i.e. WPS No. 2607/2014 which is of similar nature, but the submission had been wrongly made in the instant Writ Petition. 3.

In the given facts and finding the reasons assigned in the instant MCC to be satisfactory, the same deserve to be and is accordingly allowed. 4.

Writ Petition (S) No. 639/2014 stands restored to its original number. 5.

No order as to costs.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Sumit JUDGE