High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/3262/2018disposed off

Kuldeep Chaturvedi v. Chhattisgarh State Power Transmission Company Limited

2018-12-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 3262 of 2018 • Kuldeep Chaturvedi S/o Shri Raj Kishor Chaturvedi Aged About 35 Years Proprietor Of Best Security Services, Flat No. 301, Usha Kiran Parisar, Bhatagaon, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. Through Ravindra Banjare S/o Shri Bhuwan Prasad Banjare, Aged About 26 Years, Post - Supervisor, Best Security Services, R/o Amtara, P.S. Koni, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Chhattisgarh State Power Transmission Company Limited Through Chief Engineer (T & C), Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Chhattisgarh State Power Transmission Company Limited Through Chief Engineer (Sub Station O & M), Shed No. - 04, Danganiya, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 492013

3. Chhattisgarh State Power Transmission Company Limited, Through Executive Engineer, O/o The Chief Engineer (S/s - O & M), Shed No. - 04, Danganiya, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 492013

4. Chhattisgarh State Power Transmission Company Limited, Through Regional Accounts OfÏcer, Gudhiyari, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

5. Chhattisgarh State Power Transmission Company Limited, Through Regional Accounts OfÏcer, Raipur Road, Tifra, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Petitioner Mr. Achiyut Tiwari, Advocate For Respondent /State Mrs. Astha Shukla, Panel Lawyer Order On Board By Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra 3/12/2018

1. The petitioner executed a contract for deployment of private guards for watch and ward in the sub-stations located at various places in the State of Chhattisgarh.

2. According to the petitioner, he has executed the work in accordance with the terms of the Contract yet the security amount of Rs.7,55,343/- has not been refunded to the petitioner despite the No Dues Certificate issued by the concerned Regional OfÏcer, Chhattisgarh State Power Transmission Company, Raipur on 6.6.2018.

3. Considering the entire facts situation of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with direction that in the event, the petitioner moves before respondent No.1 within a period of 3 weeks from today, the said respondent shall consider and decide the representation seeking refund of the security deposit, by a speaking order within a period of next 6 weeks. Sd/- (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Judge Shyna