Kishor Kumar Dahre v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 7612 of 2018

1. Kishor Kumar Dahre S/o Late Shri Aktu Ram, Aged About 30 Years, Working As Assistant Teacher (Panchayat) and Posted At Sanyukta Ashram School Pahurnar, Block Geedam, District- Dantewada, Chhattisgarh

2. Govind Prasad Sahu S/o Shri Krishna Lal Sahu, Aged About 39 Years, Working as Lecturer (Panchayat) and Posted at Govt. Higher Secondary School Sikosa, Block Gunderdehi, District- Balod, Chhattisgarh

3. Vijay Kumar Tamrakar S/o Shri Ravindra Tamrakar, Aged About 44 Years, Working as Techer E. (L. B.) and Posted At Govt. Middle School Madiyan, Block Dongargarh, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh

4. Suman Sahu D/o Shri Komal Prasad Sahu, Aged About 38 Years Working as Lecturer (Panchayat) and Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Bhardakala, Block Gunderdehi, District- Balod, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Panchayat Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Balod, District- Balod, Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Dantewada, DistrictDantewada, Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Rajnandgaon, DistrictRajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh

5. Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Geedam, DistrictDantewada, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate For State :

Shri Dhiraj Wankhede, Govt. Advocate

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 26.11.2018 1.

Heard with the consent of the parties, the matter is finally disposed of. 2.

Learned counsel for the parties would submit that the issue raised in this petition is squarely covered by order dated 28.11.2017 passed by this Court in WPS No.2530 of 2017 (Mukesh Kumar Patel and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and another) and batch of petitions wherein the circular dated 23.04.2016 has been quashed, petitions allowed and it has been declared that the petitioners therein shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered by them on a lower post or on the same post. 3.

In view of the aforesaid submission and the impugned order and action is based on circular dated 23.04.2016 which has been quashed in the case referred to herein above, the petition also deserves to be allowed with a direction that the petitioner shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service including the services rendered by him on a lower post or on the same post.

4.

No order as to costs.

Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge vatti