Shweta Shrivastava v. State Of Chhattisgarh
-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7723 of 2018
1. Shweta Shrivastava D/o Krishna Bihari Shrivastava Aged About 29 Years R/o Ward No.15, Ajad Ward, New Ledari, Nai Ledari, Koriya, South Jhagrakhand Colly, District - Koriya, Chhattisgarh, Presently Posted At Government Vivekanand P.G. Collage - Manendragarh, District - Koriya, Chhattisgarh.
2. Sikha Sharma S/o Dr. Devendra Kumar Sharma Aged About 26 Years R/o Ward No.11, Old Post Office Road, Bijuri, District Annuppur, Chhattisgarh, Presently Posted At Government Vivekanand P.G. Collage - Manendragarh, District - Koriya, Chhattisgarh.
3. Dr. Umashankar Mishra S/o Ambika Prasad Mishra Aged About 32 Years R/o Village - Mauganj Ward No.5, Mauganj Rewa, M.P. 486331, Present Place Of Posting Government Lahidi Collage - Chirmiri, District - Koriya, Chhattisgarh.
4. Ramji Garg S/o Ayodhya Prasad Garg Aged About 33 Years R/o Purani Basti, Ward No.06, Kotma, District - Anuppur, Madhya Pradesh, Presently Posted At Government Vivekanand P.G. Collage - Manendragarh, District - Koriya, Chhattisgarh.
5. Smt. Rekha Singh W/o Ashok Kumar Singh Aged About 30 Years R/o Behind Civil Court, Manendragarh, District - Koriya, Chhattisgarh, Presently Posted At Government Vivekanand P.G. Collage - Manendragarh, District - Koriya, Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Higher Education Department Mantralaya, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2. Commissioner Higher Education, Block - C, 3rd, 2nd, And 3rd Floor, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
3. The Principal Government Vivekanand P.G. Collage, Manedragarh, District - Koriya, Chhattisgarh.
4. The Principal Government Lahiri Collage, Chirmiri, District - Koriya, Chhattisgarh.
5. Dean Surguja University, Ambikapur, District - Surguja Chhattisgarh. ---Respondents For Petitioners :
Mr. R.K. Pali, Advocate For State :
Mr. R.N. Pusty, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board
-228/11/2018
1. Perusal of the record shows that it is more than one advertisement which is under challenge by a common writ petition.
2. This Court is of the firm view that the said multiple reliefs or multiple challenges to different advertisements in a single writ petition would not be maintainable.
3. The writ petition accordingly stands dismissed as having not maintainable. Reserving the right of the petitioner to challenge one advertisement in a single writ petition.
Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved