High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/7748/2018disposed off

Anil Kumar Verma v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-11-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7748 of 2018 Anil Kumar Verma S/o Late Fatte Lal Verma, aged about 45 years, Lecturer, Govt. High School Latuwa, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara (C.G.).

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. District Education Officer, District Balodabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh.

3. Treasury Officer, Treasury Account And Pension, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh.

---Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Somkant Verma, Advocate For State :

Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 28/11/2018

1. The relief sought for by the petitioner is for grant of two advance increments on account of the petitioner having obtained D.Ed. qualification after having come into employment.

2. The counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue raised in the present writ petition has already been decided by this Court in a bunch of writ petitions, which stood allowed 06.12.2013. The leading case being WPS No. 6927/2011 (K.K. Dewangan & others v. State of Chhattisgarh & others) and other analogous writ petitions and the order dated 06.12.2013 has been further affirmed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.A. No. 110/2014 and other analogous appeals decided on 04.04.2014.

-23. This aspect of the matter having being already adjudicated upon by this High Court and having also being affirmed by the Division Bench is not disputed by the State counsel.

4. In view of the same, the present writ petition stands disposed off with a direction to the respondents that subject to the verification of the facts, the case of the petitioner be also considered in terms of the orders passed by this Court in the case of "K.K. Dewangan" (supra) decided on 06.12.2013 along with other bunch of writ petitions.

5. The writ petition accordingly stands allowed and disposed off. Sd/-- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Sumit