Ram Ratan v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (PIL) No. 105 of 2019 • Ram Ratan S/o Shri Dhanaram Aged About 80 Years Caste - Suryawanshi, R/o Village - Dhangavan, Police Chauki - Malhar, Police Station - Masturi, Civil and Revenue District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department of Tribal Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2. State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Under Secretary, Department of Tribal Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
3. The Director Directorate, Department of Tribal Development, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
4. The Commissioner, Department of Tribal Development, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur Chhattisgarh.
5. The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development Department, Dantewada, Civil and Revenue District - Dantewada, Chhattisgarh.
6. The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development Department, Beejapur, Revenue District - Beejapur Chhattisgarh and Civil District - Dantewada, Chhattisgarh.
7. The Collector Dantewada Civil and Revenue District Dantewada, Chhattisgarh.
8. The Collector Beejapur Revenue District - Beejapur Chhattisgarh and Civil District Dantewada, Chhattisgarh.
9. N.R. Sahu Clerk (Lekhapal), In The Office of Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development, Dantewada, Civil and Revenue District Dantewada, Chhattisgarh. 10.Dev Kumar Sahu Clerk (Lekhapal) In The Office of Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development, Beejapur, Revenue District Beejapur, Chhattisgarh and Civil And District Dantewada, Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondents
For Petitioner :
Shri Parasmani Shriwas, Advocate.
For Respondent/State :
Shri Ghanshyam Patel, Government Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri P. R. Ramachandra Menon, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board Per P. R. Ramachandra Menon, Chief Justice 12.12.2019 1.
The prayers are under following terms:
"(i) That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire record from the concern respondent authorities.
(ii) That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the concern respondent authorities (Collector Dantewada & Collector Beejapur) may be taken appropriate step to relive the respondent Nos. 9 & 10 in their transferred places within specific period in compliance of the transfer order dated 23.08.2019 (Annexure P/1) issued by Respondent No. 2.
(iii) Any other relief, which may be deemed, fit by this Hon'ble Court just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be provided in favor of the petitioner."
2.
On raising a query as to whether public interest litigation will lie in view of the nature of prayer, which is more in relation to a service matter, the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner seeks for permission to withdraw the matter.
3.
Permission is granted.
4.
The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- (P. R. Ramachandra Menon) (Parth Prateem Sahu) Chief Justice Judge Brijmohan