Smt. Sunita v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3936 of 2019 Smt. Sunita W/o Shri Ramadhar Aged About 35 Years Panch, R/o Village Bagainar, Tahsil Wadrafnagar, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Mantralaya, New Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. The Collector District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh

3. The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Wadrafnagar, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh

4. The Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Wadrafnagar, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh

5. The Tahsildar Wadrafnagar, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. S. S. Painkra, Advocate For State :

Mr. Jitendra Pali, Dy. AG Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 06/02/2020

1. The limited relief that the petitioner has prayed for in the present writ petition is for a direction to the respondent No.3 to consider the representation that the petitioner has made for declaring his place known as Bagainar, separate Gram Panchayat instead of dependent village of Gram Panchayat Bharuhibans.

2. Counsel for the petitioner prays for liberty to file a fresh representation also.

3. To this limited relief, State counsel does not oppose.

4. Accordingly the writ petition stands disposed of directing the respondent No.3 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner on its own merits in accordance with law. The petitioner would also be at liberty to file fresh representation, if he so wants.

5. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rohit