Amit Kumar Pandey v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 8986 of 2019 • Amit Kumar Pandey, S/o Shri Ramesh Kumar Pandey, Aged About 42 Years, Working As Patwari, P.H. No. 29, Mopka, Tahsil - Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Collector, Land Record Branch, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

3. Kaushal Yadav Posted As Patwari, P.H. No. 31, Lingiyadih, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Anil Tripathi, Advocate For Respondents/ State :

Ms. Richa Shukla, Deputy Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 05/11/2019

1. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner is working as Patwari and is transferred from P.H.No. 29, Mopka, Bilaspur to P.H.No 31 Lingiyadh, Bilaspur and the petitioner is subjected to frequent transfer.

2. It is contended that the transfer has been made during the ban period, therefore, the transfer shall not be given effect to as the transfer has been made by order dated 18.10.2019 were as the transfer was only allowed up till 12.07.2019.

3. Perusal of order dated 18.10.2019, shows that the transfer is in same Tehsil

i.e. Bilaspur and same District i.e. Bilaspur, it is only change of village from one to another, therefore, I am not inclined to stay the transfer order.

4. The petitioner shall be at liberty to file a representation to Respondent No. 2 within 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The representation so made shall be decided within a further period of 60 days.

5. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Jyoti