Chandrabesh Singh Sisodia @ Chandresh Singh Sisodia v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 9035 of 2019 • Chandrabesh Singh Sisodia @ Chandresh Singh Sisodia S/o Late Hanumant Singh Sisodia Aged About 43 Years Occupation Service, Assistant Director Working As District Woman And Child Development Officer, Korea DistrictKorea, Chhattisgarh. Presently Working As In-Charge, District Program Officer Department Of Woman And Child Development Korea, District- Korea, CG ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Woman And Child Development , New Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Secretary Department Of General Administration New Mantralaya New Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. The Collector District- Korea, Chhattisgarh

4. Manoj Xalxo Assistant Director, District Woman And Child Development Officer, Balrampur (Transferred As In-Charge District Woman And Child Development Korea, District Korea) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri AN Bhakta, Advocate For Respondents/State :

Shri Soumya Rai, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 07/11/2019

1. Heard.

2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner, who is working as the Incharge, District Program Officer, Women and Child Development, Korea has been transferred to District Janjgir-Champa on administrative ground to accommodate respondent No.4 Manoj Xalxo, who is 11 years junior to the

petitioner.

3. It is contended that as per clause 2.14 of the transfer policy dated 27.06.2019, junior cannot be replaced to the post of a senior and given the charge. Therefore, the transfer of the petitioner may be canceled.

4. Perused the clause 2.14 of the transfer policy as also the transfer order which is filed as Annexure P-1, which shows that for temporary arrangements the transfer has been made.

5. Given the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner make a detailed representation in this regard to the respondents within a period of 10 day from today and the respondents, in turn, shall consider and decide the same at the earliest preferably within a further period of 45 days. Till the representation of the petitioner is decided, the transfer order dated 21.08.2019 in respect of the petitioner shall not be given effect to, if the petitioner has already not been relieved till date.

6. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Ashu