← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/7680/2018disposed off

Jitendra Kumar Singh v. South Eastern Coal Field Limited

2018-11-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 7680 of 2018 Jitendra Kumar Singh S/o Late Dinanath Singh, Aged About 38 Years, Working As Overman (O/M) At Gare Pelma IV/II & III, South Eastern Coal Field Limited, Raigarh Area, District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. South Eastern Coal Field Limited Through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director, South Eastern Coal Field Limited Headquarters, Seepat Road Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

2. Deputy General Manager Personnel, South Eastern Coal Field Limited Headquarters, Seepat Road Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

3. General Manager, South Eastern Coal Field Limited, Baikunthpur Area, District- Koria, Chhattisgarh

4. Area Personnel Manager, South Eastern Coal Field Limited, Baikunthpur Area, District- Koria, Chhattisgarh

5. Sub Area Manager, South Eastern Coal Field Limited, Charcha R.O. Baikunthpur Area, District- Koria, Chhattisgarh

6. General Manager, South Eastern Coal Field Limited, Raigarh Area, District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

7. Area Personal Manager, South Eastern Coal Field Limited, Raigarh Area, District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

8. Sub Area Manager, South Eastern Coal Field Limited, Gare Pelma IV/1, IV/2 & IV/3, Raigarh Area, District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Govind Dewangan, Advocate For Respondents :

Shri Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board

27/11/2018 The relief sought for by the petitioner in the present writ petition is for a direction to the respondents for immediately sending his service sheet and LPC from the previous place of posting.

2.

Counsel appearing for the respondents makes a submission whereby he has brought on record the fact that the service sheet as also the LPC have in due course of time sent to the present place of posting of the petitioner.

3.

From the aforesaid submission it appears that the whole grievance of the petitioner itself stands redressed by the action of the respondents. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Khatai